Inefficiencie in distribution
Rising customer expectations, volatile markets and growing demand are presenting distribution companies with ever greater challenges. In many organizations, the initial focus is on operational or tactical levers: transport modes are optimized, routes are rescheduled or short-term capacity bottlenecks are compensated for. These measures are important – but are often not enough to eliminate long-term inefficiencies.
In a previous blog articles we have shown how significant cost and efficiency benefits can be achieved through data-based optimization of transport modes. But what happens when this optimization potential has been exhausted? What happens when existing distribution centers are permanently working at full capacity, demand forecasts continue to rise and operational adjustments no longer provide sustainable relief?
It is precisely at this point that strategic decisions importance. They do not concern individual transports or short-term measures, but the fundamental design of the distribution network. In this article, we take a look at typical strategic issues in distribution and show how companies systematically arrive at well-founded decisions – especially when capacity expansions become unavoidable.
What are strategic decisions in distribution?
Strategic decisions in distribution are characterized by the fact that they have a long-term effect, are capital-intensive and can only be reversed with considerable effort. They define the structural framework within which operational and tactical decisions are made in the first place.
Strategic decisions primarily concern fundamental issues:
- How is our distribution network currently structured and how should it evolve to meet future strategic and operational requirements?
- Where are hubs and distribution centers located – and how should their geographical distribution be adapted in the future?
- What capacities are needed in the medium and long term to reliably meet the growth in demand?
Such decisions not only affect costs and service levels, but also the scalability and competitiveness of a company. Errors or delays at this level often lead to operational processes coming under permanent pressure – with rising costs, declining delivery reliability and limited flexibility as a result.
Status quo: Hubs at the limit
A common starting scenario for strategic distribution decisions is a situation in which existing hubs or distribution centers have reached their capacity limits. Storage space is fully utilized, handling processes are reaching physical or personnel limits, and additional volumes can only be handled with increased effort.
At the same time, demand forecasts indicate further growth – be it through market expansion, new products or changes in customer behavior. Short-term countermeasures such as overtime, external storage space or more expensive transportation solutions can temporarily alleviate the situation, but often mean higher costs and even greater complexity of operational processes.
If strategic action is not taken in this phase, there are several risks:
- Falling service levels due to longer delivery times or lower delivery reliability
- Disproportionate rise in distribution and transportation costs
- Loss of flexibility in the event of fluctuations in demand or disruptions
- Increased dependence on short-term emergency solutions
At this point at the latest, the question no longer arises, whether the distribution network has to be adapted, but like.
Are you interested in our factsheet?
What are the benefits of mathematical optimization?
Network design & hub expansion - making strategic decisions based on data
When existing hubs reach their capacity limits, expanding the distribution network is often unavoidable. The key challenge, however, is to identify the right measure: Should an existing location be expanded? Does it make sense to open an additional hub? Or can a fundamental redesign of the network achieve better capacity utilization?
Answering these questions requires a strategic view of the overall system – supported by data, forecasts and suitable optimization models. Every structural change has a simultaneous impact on transport costs, inventories, service levels and operational complexity. This is precisely where model-based decision support comes in. With optimization software such as OPTANO, existing distribution networks can be realistically mapped and systematically analysed.
Different network designs can be modeled as scenarios based on historical data, demand forecasts and capacity restrictions: Expansion of individual hubs, additional regional locations or alternative allocations of customers to distribution centers. These scenarios are not evaluated individually, but optimized in the overall context – with clear target values such as minimum total costs, defined service levels or a balanced utilization of all locations.
The decisive added value here lies in the transparency: instead of relying on simplified assumptions or empirical values, decision-makers receive a sound quantitative basis. They can see which structural changes actually lead to relief, how robust a network is against demand growth and which investments bring the greatest long-term benefits.
More interesting articles
User-centered design helps to create software in such a way that it can be used efficiently and with pleasure. We show you how it works and what we are currently working on.
User onboarding and enablement: for effective and secure use of the new software.
Machine Learning is applied in countless areas. The OPTANO Algorithm Tuner perfoms better, also thanks to Machine Learning technology.
Plan resilience strategically instead of reacting operationally
In addition to efficiency and costs, strategic distribution decisions are increasingly focusing on another aspect: resilience. Global crises, geopolitical tensions, labour shortages and weather-related disruptions have shown how vulnerable highly optimized but less flexible networks can be.
With OPTANO, resilience strategies can not only be discussed qualitatively, but also evaluated quantitatively. By mapping the entire network in an optimization model, specific disruption scenarios can be simulated: What happens if a hub temporarily fails? What are the effects of a sharp increase in demand in individual regions? And what alternatives are available to maintain service levels?
Such scenario analyses make it possible to make conscious decisions about redundancies in order to be able to absorb conceivable failures: Additional hubs, alternative allocations or deliberately planned buffer capacities can be tested in the model and weighed up against classic efficiency targets. This makes it possible to see how much robustness a network gains – and what costs are associated with this.
The advantage of an optimization-based approach is that resilience is not seen as a blanket security measure, but as a controllable variable. Companies can decide specifically where redundancy makes sense and where it does not. Instead of relying on gut feeling, a reliable basis for decision-making is created that reconciles efficiency and robustness.
Strategic decisions as the key to efficient distribution
When operational optimization reaches its limits, strategic decisions in distribution are unavoidable. The design of the network, the targeted expansion of capacity and the conscious handling of resilience determine long-term efficiency, service levels and growth opportunities.
Gut instinct is not enough to make well-founded decisions. A holistic, data-based approach is necessary in order to understand complex interactions and realistically evaluate different options for action. With optimization-based decision support such as OPTANO, strategic scenarios can be compared transparently and reliable decisions can be made – as a basis for sustainable distribution.
Curious about how these questions can be applied to your own distribution network? We would be happy to show you how OPTANO can provide data-based support for strategic decisions.
Do you already know our Factsheet on this topic?
In our factsheet “What are the benefits of mathematical optimization?” we ask 5 questions to help you assess whether mathematical optimization brings benefits to your organization.
To obtain our factsheet, all you need to do is enter your contact details in the space below. A pop-up window will then open to download the whitepaper. Please note that by providing us with your email address, you agree that we may contact you on this topic. You may revoke this agreement at any time by contacting privacy@optano.com.
